Sir Ken Robinson's speak "Do Schools Kill Creativity" was right on target and very enjoyable. Creativity takes time, it doesn't fit into a nice box and you can't test it with a multiple choice quiz. Our schools are more and more aimed at the college bound student. Some of our kids are not college material. That doesn't mean they are not intelligent. Some are very intelligent. We don't seem to value making things, fixing things, creating things. Some kids learn in spite of school.
"No future left behind" continued the theme of schools constraining student creativity. As I reflected on the student voices, it occurred to me that many of the creative activities available to student are after school. Drama/musicals/plays, robotics, Odyssey of the Mind etc. and that those are some of the activities that are most prized by students.
Technology is not the complete answer but it is certainly part of the answer. Schools/ education needs to change. It needs to be allowed to change in a meaningful way. One size doesn't fit all. Another interesting pov comes from this speech from Danah Boyd "Living and Learning with Social Media".
"Many of you have come to this symposium to hear about all of the amazing new fangled things that are happening because of technology. There are indeed some neat things going on. But, at the end of the day, the today's teens are not that much different than yesterday's teens as a result of technology.

No comments:
Post a Comment